Request a call back
Request a callback

If you would like to take advantage of our free expert legal advice, please get in touch. You can usually speak with a specialist straight away.

or call us on:
0151 422 8020

Fields marked with an * are required

Not Guilty Verdict at Camberwell Magistrates Court

26 April 2016

My client was charged with failing to provide a specimen.  Having failed a roadside breath test, he was arrested and taken to a local police station.

At the police station, our client was asked a series of questions regarding his mental health.  The police officer became frustrated and continued to ask questions without giving him chance to answer, it was at this point the officer stated that he had failed to provide a sample and was taken to the cells. 

He was later charged with failing to provide a sample and bailed to attend a court hearing.  A plea of not guilty was entered.

We had initial concerns that the police failed to complete the MGDDA procedure, he was not taken into the breath test room at any point and was not given the opportunity to provide a sample of breath.  CCTV was requested on two occasions, this was not received.

A copy of the custody record was received from the police.  At no point in the custody record was there mention of the MGDDA procedure.  It became vital to see the CCTV before the trial date.

The Crown Prosecution Service failed to provide any further disclosure leading up to the trial date.

One the day of the trial the CCTV was given to our barrister.  Due to the amount of time before the trial began, the CCTV could not be fully viewed.  No MGDDA form had arrived at court as the officer in charge had not attended. 

The District Judge refused to allow any further time to allow the CCTV to be viewed or for the officer to bring the MGDDA. Upon proof that we had requested the evidence more than four times, our specialist barrister submitted that all evidence should be ruled inadmissible pursuant to s78 PACE if the trial went ahead.

The Crown Prosecution applied to adjourn, this was refused by the Court.  The District Jude ruled in favour of the s78 admission therefore no evidence was offered.  Our client was found not guilty.

Costs were awarded.

Related Articles

Eurofins Forensic lab forced to stop testing

Eurofins Forensic lab forced to stop testing   Police have suspended work with the UK’s largest private forensic lab following a cyber-attack earlier this month.   Eurofins Forensic services, responsible for carrying out sample Toxicology analysis for police forces across the UK, suffered a ransomware attack on the 3rd June demanding payment in order to...

Solicitor, Conor Johnstone, discussed drug driving on BBC Radio 1 Extra

Our senior solicitor, Conor Johnstone, will be at BBC Radio 1 Extra’s studio this Sunday (21st April 2019) to discuss the law surrounding drug driving. Tune in to hear more.

Drug Driving Convictions Quashed

A BBC report has found that at least 40 drug driving convictions have been quashed after results were found to be incorrect.   It is unclear why Randox Testing Services, a Manchester based laboratory, manipulated data to create false positive results. It is not known how widespread this issue is and how many samples have been...

Drunk in charge – M.A.J Law

Recent Success – Drunk in charge of a motor vehicle M.A.J Law were successful in a recent case relating to being drunk in charge of a vehicle. The Crown Prosecution Service took a very hard line approach to the case and charged our client with two offences: being in charge of a vehicle whilst in excess...

Save your licence

M.A.J. Law specialise in defending motorists nationwide. Our team have over 50 years of combined experience and first-hand knowledge of most courts in England and Wales. Free advice? Please get in touch.

Fields marked with an * are required